[Ella is nervously adjusting her paintings as Roy approaches, notebook in hand.]
Ella: Hi, Roy! I’m glad you could make it. What do you think of the new series?
Roy (smiling warmly): Hello, Ella! There’s a lot of emotion in your work. I can see you’ve poured your heart into these.
Ella: Thank you, I did. But I’m always a bit nervous about the reviews.
Roy: Understandable. Reviews can be daunting. But remember, my job isn’t just to critique but to engage with art deeply, to understand the artist’s intention.
Ella: I appreciate that. It’s just… sometimes it feels like critics just criticise instead of doing critique.
Roy: That’s a fair point. But think of us as part of the ecosystem that helps art reach wider audiences. Our perspectives can open dialogues that might not otherwise happen.
Ella: True. I’ve always wondered, though, have you ever tried painting?
Roy: I have, actually. And let’s just say, it’s much harder than it looks. That experience gave me a profound respect for what artists like you do.
Ella: That’s really comforting to hear. I guess it helps when critics understand the creation process.
Roy: Absolutely. And while I may not create art, my role is to bridge the gap between your creations and the public. We’re here to interpret, not just judge.
Ella: It sounds like a partnership, in a way.
Roy: Exactly. A good critique should support and challenge an artist. It should be a starting point for growth and understanding, not a verdict to end all discussion.
Ella: It makes me view critiques differently. More as a part of my journey than a roadblock.
Roy: That’s a great way to look at it. Shall we take a closer look at your featured piece? I’d love to hear more about what inspired it.
Ella: I’d like that, thank you, Roy.
——————-
PS: This is one of my many posts like these for stories/jokes etc where I used ChatGPT. Originally an idea by José Díaz for an on-stage parody for Agile Testing Days. I just loved the idea so much that it’s part of my work now.

Leave a comment