When a few months back, I took a decision to take the next step in my career, I was just stuck in options, suggestions and opinions. Almost for everything there were mixed views from the people whom I consulted. So, I thought that I will take the situation in my hand and then take a decision. After giving a clear thought, I came to the following conclusions -1. Quality and the kind of work will be my first consideration.
2. If the above holds true, there will be no reason that the organization will not pay me well :-).
3. I will prefer a hybrid approach for the nature of work. I owe this terminology to search engine algorithms for web crawling. Now what this means is that some people look for a depth-wise (domain-specific) approach for career, not caring about what other things are happening in the industry. They happen to be people in COEs in the long run. Some choose for breadth-wise approach, touching multiple domains and are not really concerned to cover decent knowledge in any particular domain. They happen to be good Project Managers, thereby managing multiple projects in multiple domains successfully.

Finally, for this career step, I chose for a hybrid approach – breadth-wise career steps, while covering decent depth in the time frame available. I have tried that so far, with immense satisfaction and success.

Having already spent good enough time in Manual and Automated Functional Testing, in Physical Data Model Validation for Mainframes and then in Performance Testing and Engineering for multiple domains and technologies, it’s time that I should have a taste of white-box and security testing, in combination with performance testing. Added to this, when the role demands knowledge of Unix and Perl, this is one of the most encouraging and challenging role I could target. So, as of now, this career move seems quite exciting to me!

Many of us might be in this dilemma while taking our career moves, so I would like to hear from people, who happen to read this blog entry, about their opinion about breadth-wise, depth-wise and hybrid approaches.

Rahul Verma.

3 Responses to “Taking my next Testing Career move !”

  1. raam

    Hi Rahul,

    As I am at the begining phase of my career, as of now I prefer depth wise career growth. May be after some time I will prefer Hybrid approach.

  2. Rahul Verma

    Hi Raam,

    It’s all a matter of choice and I firmly believe that your decision will suit you the best.

    With every decision, there is a calculated risk. So, while we take a decision, we should be patient and we should always keep a track as to where the decision is leading us.

    Best of Luck!

    Rahul Verma.

  3. srinivas kadiyala (skc)

    I prefer Hybrid method – breadth-wise approach 🙂

Leave a Reply


1 2 12
June 30th, 2020

Arjuna 1.1.0 Production Release

July 23rd, 2017

The Last Keynote on Software Testing

July 23rd, 2017

The Agile Qtopia

July 23rd, 2017

Reflections:: Persistent Learning

February 28th, 2017

Reflections :: Servitude

January 9th, 2017

Reflections on Testing: Dignity

May 10th, 2016

The Pluralistic School of Testing

May 9th, 2016

Don’t Ignore Your Special Users

May 9th, 2016

The Dogmatic Agile – A Critique of Deliberate Blindness

October 9th, 2015

Pattern Thinking for Performance Engineers