Schools of Testing
-
As per the plan of posts that I made at the beginning of this series, I was supposed to put overall conclusions of this series “The Big Fight – Schools of Testing”. I carefully thought and found that it will not be apt to conclude an ongoing debate. Then I thought that I will summarize
-
Till now, whatever I have published mostly consisted of consolidation of what different test practitioners have expressed on the web or what they communicated to me via email. It’s my turn now. Since the beginning of this series of posts on Schools of testing, I have been pinging myself, about my views. Today, I will
-
This is in continuation to the previous post about views of the Indian Testing Community on Schools of Testing. This post contains the outcome of the brainstorming sessions conducted in two organizations, namely McAfee Software (India) and Applabs Technologies. I will publish the names of the participants in the Thanks note for this series. I
-
So far it has been about what I found on the web as published views. As you can observe in the previous posts on the series, the only tester from Indian Testing community who found a mention was Shrini Kulkarni. I did not feel quite comfortable with this. I being a part of Indian testing
-
This is the third post in continuation to the previous posts (Post-I and Post-II), which discussed the views of various testing experts against the concept of Schools of Testing. In this post, I would publish the views, which I consolidated from one of the comments in Cem Kaner’s blog and SQAForums. This post also includes
-
This is in continuation to the previous post, which discussed the views of various testing experts against concept of Schools of Testing. In this post, I would publish the views, which I consolidated from software-testing yahoo group and SQAForums. I could not find corresponding web page links for the authors of most of such views.
-
In the previous post, I discussed the views of various testing experts in favour of Schools of Testing. But not everyone feels that way! There are some experts, who are against the concept of schools of testing. There are still others, who find the subject fine, but not for dividing the testers into groups. There
-
The last couple of days have been quite tough, as I had to read a lot of stuff on blogs, discussion groups and websites. But all for good! I have consolidated the views from different experts in three categories – Views in Favour, Views Against and the views which I found to be neutral in
-
This is the fourth post in the series of “The Big Fight – Schools of Testing”. For my previous posts on Schools of Testing, you can check the posts under the Schools of Testing Category. I had not thought to include this topic as a separate post as per the plan of posts and contents.
-
I introduced this series of posts on Schools of Testing and talked about the origin of this concept, in the previous posts. Now, it’s time to discuss that going by the definition of a school of testing, into how many and what schools of testing, the proponents of this concept have categorized the testing community.
Rahul Verma: My Petty Bits 